<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Consent&#187; Radical Cooperation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://no-consent.org/category/radical-cooperation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://no-consent.org</link>
	<description>...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=402</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No, Illinois is Not About to Force Churches to Perform Gay Marriages</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2013/01/24/no-illinois-is-not-about-to-force-churches-to-perform-gay-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2013/01/24/no-illinois-is-not-about-to-force-churches-to-perform-gay-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few days I&#8217;ve seen a number of people starting to panic about Illinois House Bill 110, a same-sex marriage bill that is rumored to contain language that would force churches to perform same-sex marriages regardless of the churches&#8217; stand on homosexuality.  I&#8217;ve done what most lawmakers won&#8217;t do and read the legislation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2013/01/24/no-illinois-is-not-about-to-force-churches-to-perform-gay-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Horribly Misguided Christian Justification for War</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all the Christians who justify modern war by citing the fact that God commanded Israel to fight wars, there is a significant difference between God giving a direct command to his people for a specific purpose, and a secular government choosing to pursue war for its own interests. God has the right to exact [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Santorum?  Because He&#8217;d Be Bush&#8217;s Fourth Term.</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Edward Veith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming on the heels of Rick Santorum&#8217;s recent wins in Minnesota, Missouri, and Colorado, Gene Edward Veith asks &#8220;Why not Santorum?&#8220;  I greatly enjoyed the response of commenter &#8220;Cincinnatus&#8221;.  Take a look. Hold up. Few honest observers now deny that Bush and Obama have governed in dramatically similar ways. Both pursued bailouts, both pursued various [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Christian Conservatism Isn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/01/02/your-christian-conservatism-isnt/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/01/02/your-christian-conservatism-isnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Mefferd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the way home from the the coffee shop tonight (when your wife is out of the country, you find a lot of ways to kill time), I was listening to The Janet Mefferd Show, a Christian political radio talk show.  The show seems to be on during my commute almost every day, so I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/01/02/your-christian-conservatism-isnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Bill of Rights Day!</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercatus Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, December 15th, is Bill of Rights Day. Too bad our rulers have run that document through the shredder. The Cato Institute has put together a short video showing how our rights are being casually disposed of by those in power. Bill of Rights Day Video For more specifics on the loss of our liberties, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Libertarianism: Answering the Objections</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/30/on-libertarianism-answering-the-objections/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/30/on-libertarianism-answering-the-objections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocates for Self Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rothbard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruwart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Humble Libertarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a libertarian.  Talk to my brother, though, and he&#8217;ll tell you about the time I was a hard-core right-winger and told him that libertarians were stupid.  My, how things change.  Over the years, I&#8217;ve learned that many of my old objections to libertarianism were either invalid or completely irrelevant, and below you&#8217;ll find some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/30/on-libertarianism-answering-the-objections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Don&#8217;t Have Anything Honest to Say, Don&#8217;t Do Economics At All</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/28/if-you-dont-have-anything-honest-to-say-dont-do-economics-at-all/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/28/if-you-dont-have-anything-honest-to-say-dont-do-economics-at-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austrian Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo-monetarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, economist Brad DeLong conveniently cuts off a quote mid-thought in an attempt to &#8220;prove&#8221; how crazy/dishonest those kooky Austrians are (for those not aware, &#8220;Austrian&#8221; is shorthand for a more capital-based school of economics than that of the mainstream).  DeLong uses this half quote to claim that Ludwig von Mises held an absurd [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/28/if-you-dont-have-anything-honest-to-say-dont-do-economics-at-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Politicians and the Media Shouldn&#8217;t Be Given the Benefit of the Doubt</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/21/why-politicians-and-the-media-shouldnt-be-given-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/21/why-politicians-and-the-media-shouldnt-be-given-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qaddafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One news outlet reports that something may have happened, and before long, the general consensus is that something definitely happened, and that it was worse than initially thought.  Whether it&#8217;s WMD in Iraq, swine flu, or Presidential claims that someone is a terrorist, the responsible citizen will question everything and never give politicians and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/21/why-politicians-and-the-media-shouldnt-be-given-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left and Right: Supporters of Pillage, Enemies of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/15/left-and-right-supporters-of-pillage-enemies-of-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/15/left-and-right-supporters-of-pillage-enemies-of-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#OccupyWallStreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99 Percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#8217;t have to be a leftist to see something wrong with the way government bails out its cronies in banking and Big Business.  When you hear mainstream conservatives talking about &#8220;free markets&#8221;, they&#8217;re probably referring to no such thing, but instead describing something more like what is depicted in the cartoon below. I&#8217;m a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/15/left-and-right-supporters-of-pillage-enemies-of-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/07/guess-who/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/07/guess-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across this summary of a famous politician&#8217;s economic program.  Guess who. He suspended the gold standard, embarked on huge public works programs[...], protected industry from foreign competition, expanded credit, instituted jobs programs, bullied the private sector on prices and production decisions, vastly expanded the military, enforced capital controls, instituted family planning, penalized smoking, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/07/guess-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not the &#8220;One Percent&#8221; Who Have Been Murdering and Molesting</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/its-not-the-one-percent-who-have-been-murdering-and-molesting/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/its-not-the-one-percent-who-have-been-murdering-and-molesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#OccupyWallStreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99 Percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Percent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been hearing a lot about the evils of the &#8220;top one percent&#8221; lately as protests against the wealthy are occurring in numerous American cities.  I think Anthony Gregory has a better handle on who the real bad guys are, as evidenced by the quote below: I sure wish the &#8220;top one percent&#8221; hadn&#8217;t slaughtered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/its-not-the-one-percent-who-have-been-murdering-and-molesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sloppy Commentary is No Way to Get People On Our Side</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/sloppy-commentary-is-no-way-to-get-people-on-our-side/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/sloppy-commentary-is-no-way-to-get-people-on-our-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lew Rockwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lew Rockwell played a big role in my intellectual development, so it&#8217;s always a bit unpleasant to criticize him, but lately he hasn&#8217;t been making it easy on himself.  In this latest instance, Rockwell posted a link to a Daily Mail article on British Prime Minister David Cameron&#8217;s recent address to the Conservative Party conference.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/10/05/sloppy-commentary-is-no-way-to-get-people-on-our-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Hates Poor People</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/illinois-hates-poor-people/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/illinois-hates-poor-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braiding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m having a hard time concealing my disgust at this one.  The State of Illinois has announced that only 300 hours of training is required to be eligible for a license to braid hair for money. Excuse me?  What right does Illinois have to require a license for such a mundane activity in the first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/illinois-hates-poor-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Businessmen Aren&#8217;t Angels&#8230;But Neither is Government</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/businessmen-arent-angels-but-neither-is-government/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/businessmen-arent-angels-but-neither-is-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the following graphic I&#8217;ve been seeing float around Facebook lately: Remember when government officials pursued misguided economic policies that contributed to the stock market crash, took trillions from taxpayers to bail out their cronies, limited oil companies&#8217; responsibility for damage while restricting drilling to deeper water, thus encouraging more dangerous ventures, funneled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/28/businessmen-arent-angels-but-neither-is-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose Pronunciation is Correct?</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/26/whose-pronunciation-is-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/26/whose-pronunciation-is-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cato Institute&#8217;s Walter Olson posted an article today criticizing the idea that states should be prohibited from monitoring the English fluency of their teachers.  He makes the point that teachers were once &#8220;demons for correctness&#8221; in pronunciation, and that federal control over education is threatening this tradition.  Now, I&#8217;m no fan of federal control [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/09/26/whose-pronunciation-is-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Quick Cache: failed to write cache. The cache/ directory is either non-existent ( and could not be created ) or it is not writable. -->