<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Consent&#187; The Nihilist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://no-consent.org/category/the-nihilist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://no-consent.org</link>
	<description>...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=408</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Irrationality and Politics</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a video from this professor making the rounds on some of my favorite blogs, and since philosophers rarely get re-posted to such places, i thought i would go ahead and re-re-post. http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/irrationality.htm As usual, i have trouble with the usage of the notion of rationality/irrationality here, but i find it to be an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Theory, i</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/27/political-theory-i/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/27/political-theory-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is difficult to put together a cohesive political theory when one is a nihilist.  This is probably unsurprising.  The rolling of eyes and the pained facial expressions when others speak of politics, this is easy enough.  But when one gets queried oneself and the only reply one can muster is, &#8220;well &#8230; it&#8217;s complicated.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/27/political-theory-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynesian</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/09/keynesian/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/09/keynesian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The heart of the Keynesian critique of 19th century neo-classical economics is this:  the assumption that the natural state of an economy is to tend toward full employment of its resources is a weak assumption, that there can be very long periods of vast idle resources.  A quick glance of economic history suggests that this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/12/09/keynesian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>deflation, iii</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/19/deflation-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/19/deflation-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finale &#8230; The previous post spoke of rates of change.  One of the two major problems with allowing monetary/credit driven deflationary pressure in 2008 (and to some extent still today, especially if European banks start going belly-up causing more of the same) is pulled from that discussion.  Such deflation is bad because it would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/19/deflation-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deflation, ii</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/12/deflation-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/12/deflation-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first post on this topic discussed a case where deflation is good.  I&#8217;m going to start off this post in a similar vein, introducing a case where inflation is good.  This will be a case of credit based inflation. Imagine a place where credit does not exist.  The people inhabiting this land are rational [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/12/deflation-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deflation, i</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/10/deflation-i/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/10/deflation-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The topic which brought me here to blog is &#8220;deflation&#8221;.  So in Paul Erdős fashion, allow me to jump right in. 1) Neither inflation nor deflation are inherently bad.  They are the means by which a market returns to equilibrium when there has been some change in the &#8220;ability to purchase&#8221; side of the equation against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2011/11/10/deflation-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  no-consent.org/category/the-nihilist/feed/ ) in 1.38670 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 3:32 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 4:32 am UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  no-consent.org/category/the-nihilist/feed/ ) in 0.00028 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 4:27 am UTC. -->