<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Consent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://no-consent.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://no-consent.org</link>
	<description>...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 02:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More delegates for Ron Paul</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/05/06/more-delegates-for-ron-paul/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/05/06/more-delegates-for-ron-paul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 02:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erich Buerger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peaceful Dissent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul is winning the caucus states&#8217; delegates. First, he won Iowa and Minnesota&#8230;and now Nevada and Maine. The fact of the matter is, delegates win nominations. Not who the media tells you is the &#8220;favorite&#8221;. I have to admit, at first I was skeptical his plan to win delegates would work. But, so far, it appears it is&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/05/06/more-delegates-for-ron-paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Principal&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/13/no-principals-office/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/13/no-principals-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading a comedic article recently, something struck me. To begin, let me present the relevant paragraph, wherein the author is describing the experience of the quintessential high-school class clown during his first college course: “Anyway, that lasted about a minute and a half before the teacher finally had enough and just flat-out stopped her class [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/13/no-principals-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disappearing Conservatism</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/07/disappearing-conservatism/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/07/disappearing-conservatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erich Buerger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Out of Control Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peaceful Dissent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditional conservatism is no more. It&#8217;s, for a lack of a better word, dead. Democratic leaders who criticize these so-called conservatives for being &#8220;right wing&#8221; are misunderstanding what true conservatism means. Listen to and read the likes of Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Robert Taft and Russell Kirk, and you&#8217;ll notice one clear objective &#8211; limit the size [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/07/disappearing-conservatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Refunds &#8211; you gotta love &#8216;em</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/03/tax-refunds-you-gotta-love-em/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/03/tax-refunds-you-gotta-love-em/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erich Buerger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peaceful Dissent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahhh, there&#8217;s nothing like getting your money taken away and then given back to you&#8230; &#160; Tweet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/03/tax-refunds-you-gotta-love-em/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divine Warfare</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/01/divine-warfare/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/01/divine-warfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to take this opportunity to commend and hopefully add to what my esteemed fellow blogger, The Cooperator, wrote recently about a misguided justification for war used especially by Christians. I write this from the perspective of a Russian Orthodox Christian who some years ago spent three years in the Roman Catholic seminary. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/04/01/divine-warfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Posts by our Team of Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/29/recent-posts-by-our-team-of-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/29/recent-posts-by-our-team-of-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst the Founder has been lax (and he is about to get back into the swing of things), others have been posting&#8230;.. Misguided Christian Justification for War by Radical Cooperation A Call to Civilization Part 1 and Part 2 by the Gent Stimulating Unemployment by the Gent Tweet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/29/recent-posts-by-our-team-of-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Horribly Misguided Christian Justification for War</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all the Christians who justify modern war by citing the fact that God commanded Israel to fight wars, there is a significant difference between God giving a direct command to his people for a specific purpose, and a secular government choosing to pursue war for its own interests. God has the right to exact [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/22/a-horribly-misguided-christian-justification-for-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Call to Civilization: 2. “Reason and Brute Force”</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/18/a-call-to-civilization-2-reason-and-brute-force/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/18/a-call-to-civilization-2-reason-and-brute-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part two of a four-part series titled “A Call to Civilization” in which I exhort people to recognize the situation in which they find themselves today and act to better it. See part one. It is impossible to engage the defenders of totalitarianism in intellectual discourse because theirs is not an intellectually defensible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/18/a-call-to-civilization-2-reason-and-brute-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Call to Civilization: 1. “Unworthy of a Civilized People”</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/16/a-call-to-civilization-1-unworthy-of-a-civilized-people/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/16/a-call-to-civilization-1-unworthy-of-a-civilized-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part one of a four-part series titled “A Call to Civilization” in which I exhort people to recognize the situation in which they find themselves today and act to better it. It is utterly unworthy of a civilized people to allow itself to be governed by a bourgeois political system populated by irresponsible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/16/a-call-to-civilization-1-unworthy-of-a-civilized-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stimulating Unemployment</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/15/stimulating-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/15/stimulating-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Out of Control Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Promoting the proposed 2009 stimulus, members of the legislative and executive branches of the USA national government used the percentage of unemployed as a metric. Specifically, they warned unemployment would rise unless the stimulus bill were passed into law and the money spent. A fall in the rate of unemployment would be occasioned by the bill&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/03/15/stimulating-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retreated So Far</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/retreated-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/retreated-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a quote recently that bears repeating: “It is sad when the battlelines for the defense of liberty have retreated so far that it is necessary to argue that it is imprudent to permit Presidents to secretly kill one&#8217;s fellow citizens.” —James Bovard, 09 February 2012, antiwar.com Tweet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/retreated-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toxic Local Governments</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/toxic-local-governments/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/toxic-local-governments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen J. Chojnicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Gent Don't Consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DuPage County in Illinois has been recognized for having used less salt in the past years than they otherwise would have used. This brings several thoughts to my mind: 1. Why does not every county implement a similar mixture of de-icing chemicals that have a lesser impact on the local environment? 2. Given the number of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/24/toxic-local-governments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irrationality and Politics</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schminke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Nihilist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a video from this professor making the rounds on some of my favorite blogs, and since philosophers rarely get re-posted to such places, i thought i would go ahead and re-re-post. http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/irrationality.htm As usual, i have trouble with the usage of the notion of rationality/irrationality here, but i find it to be an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/22/irrationality-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Santorum?  Because He&#8217;d Be Bush&#8217;s Fourth Term.</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radical Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Edward Veith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming on the heels of Rick Santorum&#8217;s recent wins in Minnesota, Missouri, and Colorado, Gene Edward Veith asks &#8220;Why not Santorum?&#8220;  I greatly enjoyed the response of commenter &#8220;Cincinnatus&#8221;.  Take a look. Hold up. Few honest observers now deny that Bush and Obama have governed in dramatically similar ways. Both pursued bailouts, both pursued various [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/08/why-not-santorum-because-hed-be-bushs-fourth-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against the minimum wage</title>
		<link>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/02/the-case-against-the-minimum-wage/</link>
		<comments>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/02/the-case-against-the-minimum-wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erich Buerger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peaceful Dissent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-consent.org/?p=2038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the title of this blog post is serious&#8230;and no I&#8217;m not some racist bigot that wants the poor &#8211; specifically the poor black community &#8211; to suffer and stagnate in poverty. My reasons for its opposition are quite the opposite: I want the poorest of the poor to be able to seek a job. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://no-consent.org/2012/02/02/the-case-against-the-minimum-wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  no-consent.org/feed/ ) in 0.72702 seconds, on May 20th, 2012 at 3:25 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 20th, 2012 at 4:25 am UTC -->
